[Wed Aug 1 10:03:16 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (159.8, 336.1) = 0 7 8.96 20 14 28.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 75.8 +/- 11.3 Background counts = 6.8 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003 [Wed Aug 1 10:03:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.41' [Wed Aug 1 14:59:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Aug 1 14:59:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.64" [Wed Aug 1 14:59:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.893 [Wed Aug 1 14:59:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 11.64" [Wed Aug 1 16:06:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists [Wed Aug 1 16:06:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Wed Aug 1 16:06:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists [Wed Aug 1 16:06:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv [Wed Aug 1 16:06:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Aug 1 16:06:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Wed Aug 1 16:06:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Wed Aug 1 16:06:21 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0101040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly [Wed Aug 1 16:06:49 2012] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 13.940822 pixels away [Wed Aug 1 16:06:49 2012] Source 7 is offset by -4.602125 and -3.233372 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.971108 x 1.971108, not incorporating fit results [Wed Aug 1 16:06:49 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 107.081000, observed total counts = 106.000000 [Wed Aug 1 16:06:49 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 2.159239 pixels [Wed Aug 1 16:06:49 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 17 to 29 [Wed Aug 1 16:06:49 2012] 109.204500 total counts/ 96.707200 bgd. counts: snr = 1.270828 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 2.159239 pixels Position = (161.7, 335.1) = 0 7 8.38 20 14 19.8 Extent = 6.4 (5.3-11.8)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 12.5 +/- 10.5 Background counts = 96.7 Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0003 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability