[Tue May 29 19:50:32 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (321.7, 387.8) = 11 4 18.29 38 20 47.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 84.2 +/- 13.2
  Background counts = 17.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Tue May 29 19:50:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.70'
[Tue May 29 21:20:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 29 21:20:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.78"
[Tue May 29 21:20:42 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.662
[Tue May 29 21:20:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 9.78"
[Tue May 29 22:49:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 22:49:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Tue May 29 22:49:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 22:49:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Tue May 29 22:49:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 22:49:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 22:49:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Tue May 29 22:49:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 22:49:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Tue May 29 22:49:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 22:49:55 2012] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 15.778779 pixels away
[Tue May 29 22:49:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 29 22:49:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 29 22:49:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 29 22:49:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 29 22:49:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 30 00:12:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 30 00:12:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.78"
[Wed May 30 00:12:14 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.662
[Wed May 30 00:12:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 9.78"
[Wed May 30 01:36:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 01:36:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Wed May 30 01:36:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 01:36:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Wed May 30 01:36:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 30 01:36:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 01:36:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Wed May 30 01:36:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 01:36:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Wed May 30 01:36:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0099280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 30 01:36:49 2012] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 33.414775 pixels away
[Wed May 30 01:36:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 30 01:36:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 30 01:36:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 30 01:36:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 30 01:36:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 30 01:36:49 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9