[Tue Jun  5 13:11:19 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (225.0, 419.3) = 10 7 16.71 -70 6 58.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 46.4 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 51.9
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Jun  5 13:11:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.25'
[Tue Jun  5 13:30:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun  5 13:30:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.56"
[Tue Jun  5 13:30:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.652
[Tue Jun  5 13:30:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 11.56"
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Tue Jun  5 17:15:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 20:33:48 2012] Warning, spatial fit 12 centroid is now closest to src. 13
[Tue Jun  5 20:33:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  5 20:33:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  5 20:33:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  5 20:33:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  5 20:33:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  5 20:33:48 2012] Source is confused with source 11
[Tue Jun  5 20:34:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun  5 20:34:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.56"
[Tue Jun  5 20:34:42 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.652
[Tue Jun  5 20:34:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 11.56"
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Wed Jun  6 00:35:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0099020301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun  6 02:58:34 2012] Warning: source 11 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 14.213384 pixels away
[Wed Jun  6 02:58:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 12 centroid is now closest to src. 11
[Wed Jun  6 02:58:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun  6 02:58:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun  6 02:58:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun  6 02:58:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun  6 02:58:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun  6 02:58:35 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9