[Sun Jun  3 01:22:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.8, 272.2) = 16 27 26.78 -49 12 39.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 99.8 +/- 17.6
  Background counts = 81.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Jun  3 01:23:00 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.51'
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.18"
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.917
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 9.18"
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:58 2012] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 12.323665 pixels away
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  4 16:38:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  4 16:38:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.18"
[Mon Jun  4 16:38:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.917
[Mon Jun  4 16:38:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 9.18"
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:30 2012] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 18.506292 pixels away
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  4 20:28:30 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9