[Sun Jun 3 01:22:35 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (164.0, 289.7) = 16 28 58.08 -49 11 20.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 66.0 +/- 12.5 Background counts = 36.5 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Sun Jun 3 01:22:35 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.77' [Sun Jun 3 03:23:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 3 03:23:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.31" [Sun Jun 3 03:23:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.936 [Sun Jun 3 03:23:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 11.31" [Sun Jun 3 12:03:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 12:03:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv [Sun Jun 3 12:03:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 12:03:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv [Sun Jun 3 12:03:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 3 12:03:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 12:03:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 12:03:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 3 13:36:51 2012] Warning: source 67 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 63 at 10.923344 pixels away [Sun Jun 3 13:36:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 3 13:36:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 3 13:36:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 3 13:36:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 3 13:36:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 3 13:36:51 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8