[Sun Jun  3 01:22:35 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (336.7, 294.7) = 16 27 41.44 -49 11 4.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 90.4 +/- 21.0
  Background counts = 172.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Jun  3 01:22:35 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.79'
[Sun Jun  3 03:23:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 03:23:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.82"
[Sun Jun  3 03:23:34 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.183
[Sun Jun  3 03:23:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 0, mean size = 7.82"
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 12:03:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0098610201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:51 2012] Source 61 is offset by -7.450761 and -4.098437 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.196920 x 2.196920, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  3 13:36:51 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9