[Wed Aug 22 10:37:56 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (289.8, 130.9) = 16 28 2.19 -49 22 49.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 34.7 +/- 9.7
  Background counts = 12.7
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0004

[Wed Aug 22 10:37:56 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.16'
[Wed Aug 22 13:18:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 22 13:18:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.51"
[Wed Aug 22 13:18:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.921
[Wed Aug 22 13:18:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 12.51"
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:47 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:47 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 28 centroid is now closest to src. 31
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 32 centroid is now closest to src. 36
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 33 centroid is now closest to src. 22
[Wed Aug 22 18:37:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 36 centroid is now closest to src. 40
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 306.043000, observed total counts = 303.000000
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 1.963382 pixels
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 13 to 11
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] 285.716000 total counts/ 150.916000 bgd. counts: snr = 10.972921
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 1.963382 pixels
  Position = (289.5, 129.0) = 16 28 2.32 -49 23 2.0
  Extent = 18.4 (11.4-25.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 134.8 +/- 16.9
  Background counts = 150.9
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0007
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] Warning, spatial fit 13 centroid is now closest to src. 11
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 22 18:38:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 22 20:16:38 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 22 20:16:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 18.37"
[Wed Aug 22 20:16:38 2012] source mask rpix=4.2, npix_max = 89, mask sum = 90, frac = 1.008
[Wed Aug 22 20:16:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 18.37"
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:09 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0098610101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:15 2012] Warning, spatial fit 19 centroid is now closest to src. 28
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] Warning, spatial fit 26 centroid is now closest to src. 25
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 560.468000, observed total counts = 549.000000
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.703172 pixels
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] 563.492000 total counts/ 458.520000 bgd. counts: snr = 4.902237
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.703172 pixels
  Position = (289.7, 129.6) = 16 28 2.22 -49 22 59.1
  Extent = 17.9 (11.9-36.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 105.0 +/- 23.7
  Background counts = 458.5
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 22 20:25:16 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9