[Tue Jun 25 16:58:41 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (419.1, 195.2) = 8 2 44.20 -40 6 20.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 89.9 +/- 14.3
  Background counts = 30.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Tue Jun 25 16:58:41 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.51'
[Tue Jun 25 17:13:19 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 17:13:19 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.19"
[Tue Jun 25 17:13:19 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.826
[Tue Jun 25 17:13:19 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 12.19"
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 16.058960 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 20:36:06 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 20:36:06 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Jun 25 20:36:06 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.19"
[Tue Jun 25 20:36:06 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.826
[Tue Jun 25 20:36:06 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 12.19"
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 14.717821 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8