[Tue Jun 25 16:58:41 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (218.7, 271.9) = 8 4 0.13 -40 0 48.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 91.9 +/- 14.5
  Background counts = 52.9
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Tue Jun 25 16:58:41 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.09'
[Tue Jun 25 17:13:19 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 17:13:19 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.47"
[Tue Jun 25 17:13:19 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.046
[Tue Jun 25 17:13:19 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 9.47"
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Tue Jun 25 18:42:56 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Warning: source 22 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 25 at 13.297519 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:45 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 20:36:06 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 20:36:06 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.47"
[Tue Jun 25 20:36:06 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.046
[Tue Jun 25 20:36:06 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 9.47"
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Tue Jun 25 21:01:10 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 567.050000, observed total counts = 465.000000
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:14 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8