[Tue Jun 25 16:59:27 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (274.2, 281.9) = 8 3 39.13 -40 0 2.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 130.8 +/- 23.9
  Background counts = 13.8
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Tue Jun 25 16:59:27 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.13'
[Tue Jun 25 19:14:39 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 19:14:39 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Tue Jun 25 19:14:39 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.810
[Tue Jun 25 19:14:39 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 7.49"
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:35 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:35 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:35 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:35 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:36 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:36 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:36 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:36 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:36 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:56 2013] Source 6 is offset by -8.559506 and 0.423653 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.843660 x 2.056814, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:56 2013] Source 6 is offset by 7.078701 and 5.215263 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.274207 x 5.597885, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:56 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:56 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:56 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:56 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:56 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 20:35:56 2013] Source is confused with source 4
[Tue Jun 25 21:07:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 21:07:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Tue Jun 25 21:07:34 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.810
[Tue Jun 25 21:07:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 7.49"
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0095810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Source 6 is offset by -5.524012 and -0.567563 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.633076 x 0.633076, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Source 6 is offset by -8.559506 and 0.447814 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.890713 x 2.301908, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Source 6 is offset by -8.829046 and 0.567148 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.383108 x 1.383108, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 22:18:17 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9