[Fri May 31 02:53:35 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (348.3, 377.2) = 4 32 44.83 -13 11 26.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 96.3 +/- 15.4
  Background counts = 58.9
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007

[Fri May 31 02:53:36 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.76'
[Fri May 31 03:02:05 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 31 03:02:05 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.81"
[Fri May 31 03:02:05 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.988
[Fri May 31 03:02:05 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 0, mean size = 9.81"
[Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.csv
[Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.csv
[Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 31 14:30:39 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 716.736000, observed total counts = 564.000000
[Fri May 31 14:30:39 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 57
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 31 14:31:26 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 31 14:31:26 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.81"
[Fri May 31 14:31:26 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.988
[Fri May 31 14:31:26 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 9.81"
[Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 713.431000, observed total counts = 564.000000
[Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 57
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9