[Fri May 31 02:53:34 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (226.6, 198.1) = 4 33 21.10 -13 24 26.2 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 99.4 +/- 16.0 Background counts = 63.4 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005 [Fri May 31 02:53:36 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.94' [Fri May 31 03:02:05 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 31 03:02:05 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.90" [Fri May 31 03:02:05 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.581 [Fri May 31 03:02:05 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 0, mean size = 10.90" [Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg exists [Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv [Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg exists [Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv [Fri May 31 07:36:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists [Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv [Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists [Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv [Fri May 31 07:36:22 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 31 14:30:39 2013] Source 40 is offset by -8.786321 and 2.647994 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.252989 x 1.252989, not incorporating fit results [Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 31 14:30:40 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 31 14:31:26 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 31 14:31:26 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.90" [Fri May 31 14:31:26 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.581 [Fri May 31 14:31:26 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 37 for pass 1, mean size = 10.90" [Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.ximg exists [Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.csv [Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37_1.ximg exists [Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.csv [Fri May 31 18:20:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37.ximg exists [Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37.csv [Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg exists [Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37.csv [Fri May 31 18:20:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Source 40 is offset by -8.785355 and 2.645121 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.252989 x 1.252989, not incorporating fit results [Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 31 22:47:05 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9