[Fri May 31 02:55:17 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (185.2, 169.1) = 4 33 33.45 -13 26 32.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 79.9 +/- 12.3
  Background counts = 13.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Fri May 31 02:55:19 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.46'
[Fri May 31 12:31:19 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 31 12:31:19 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.66"
[Fri May 31 12:31:19 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 43, frac = 0.924
[Fri May 31 12:31:19 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 0, mean size = 12.66"
[Fri May 31 14:30:13 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 14:30:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Fri May 31 14:30:13 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 14:30:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Fri May 31 14:30:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 31 14:30:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 14:30:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Fri May 31 14:30:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 14:30:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Fri May 31 14:30:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 31 14:31:07 2013] Warning: source 31 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 16.282850 pixels away
[Fri May 31 14:31:07 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 31 14:31:07 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 31 14:31:07 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 31 14:31:07 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 31 14:31:07 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 31 21:45:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 31 21:45:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.66"
[Fri May 31 21:45:57 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 43, frac = 0.924
[Fri May 31 21:45:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 12.66"
[Fri May 31 22:46:45 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 22:46:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Fri May 31 22:46:45 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 22:46:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Fri May 31 22:46:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 31 22:46:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 22:46:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri May 31 22:46:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 31 22:46:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri May 31 22:46:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0095011101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 31 22:47:21 2013] Warning: source 20 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 15.709988 pixels away
[Fri May 31 22:47:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 31 22:47:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 31 22:47:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 31 22:47:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 31 22:47:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 31 22:47:21 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9