[Mon Aug 27 06:52:01 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (251.6, 438.3) = 13 56 17.20 18 34 13.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 29.9 +/- 7.5
  Background counts = 6.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Mon Aug 27 06:52:01 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.69'
[Mon Aug 27 07:36:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 27 07:36:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.77"
[Mon Aug 27 07:36:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.021
[Mon Aug 27 07:36:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 11.77"
[Mon Aug 27 08:09:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 08:09:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 08:09:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 27 08:09:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 08:09:02 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 08:09:02 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 27 08:34:43 2012] Warning: source 24 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 25 at 16.273662 pixels away
[Mon Aug 27 08:34:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Aug 27 08:34:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Aug 27 08:34:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Aug 27 08:34:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Aug 27 08:34:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 27 09:12:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 27 09:12:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.77"
[Mon Aug 27 09:12:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.021
[Mon Aug 27 09:12:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 11.77"
[Mon Aug 27 09:38:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 09:38:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Mon Aug 27 09:38:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 09:38:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Mon Aug 27 09:38:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 27 09:38:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 09:38:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 09:38:06 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0094401201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 27 10:00:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 96.996000, observed total counts = 97.000000
[Mon Aug 27 10:00:48 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 0.382705 pixels
[Mon Aug 27 10:00:48 2012] 99.518200 total counts/ 83.810000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.715847
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 0.382705 pixels
  Position = (251.4, 438.0) = 13 56 17.29 18 34 11.5
  Extent = 3.8 (2.9-5.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 15.7 +/- 10.0
  Background counts = 83.8
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability