[Sat Jun 2 21:24:19 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (304.6, 285.7) = 4 16 45.66 1 5 43.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 101.2 +/- 17.9 Background counts = 76.8 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003 [Sat Jun 2 21:24:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.02' [Sat Jun 2 21:27:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 2 21:27:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.94" [Sat Jun 2 21:27:48 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.911 [Sat Jun 2 21:27:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 6.94" [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv [Sat Jun 2 21:37:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0094383101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 2 21:56:34 2012] Source 3 is offset by -5.784557 and 5.116253 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.797738 x 0.797738, not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 2 21:56:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 2 21:56:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 2 21:56:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 2 21:56:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 2 21:56:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 2 21:56:34 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9