[Thu Jul 19 10:29:50 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (344.4, 234.2) = 11 35 38.58 70 3 22.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 39.7 +/- 10.7
  Background counts = 23.0
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Thu Jul 19 10:29:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.73'
[Thu Jul 19 12:51:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul 19 12:51:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.29"
[Thu Jul 19 12:51:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.899
[Thu Jul 19 12:51:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 0, mean size = 9.29"
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:09 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:33 2012] Warning: source 30 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 12.936496 pixels away
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jul 19 18:05:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jul 19 20:06:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul 19 20:06:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.29"
[Thu Jul 19 20:06:28 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.899
[Thu Jul 19 20:06:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 9.29"
[Thu Jul 19 22:56:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 19 22:56:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 19 22:56:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jul 19 22:56:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 19 22:56:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 19 22:56:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0094170101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jul 19 22:56:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 35.843000, observed total counts = 33.000000
[Thu Jul 19 22:56:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 62 = 2.376010 pixels
[Thu Jul 19 22:56:38 2012] 31.696930 total counts/ 25.180100 bgd. counts: snr = 1.298696
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 62 = 2.376010 pixels
  Position = (346.6, 233.5) = 11 35 36.65 70 3 15.2
  Extent = 5.7 (2.3-9.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 6.5 +/- 5.6
  Background counts = 25.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability