[Tue Jul 31 04:57:37 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (385.0, 349.0) = 17 12 50.48 -39 44 42.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 34.3 +/- 9.2
  Background counts = 14.9
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Tue Jul 31 04:57:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.27'
[Tue Jul 31 06:10:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 06:10:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.06"
[Tue Jul 31 06:10:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.137
[Tue Jul 31 06:10:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 10.06"
[Tue Jul 31 06:37:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 06:37:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Jul 31 06:37:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 06:37:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Jul 31 06:37:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 06:37:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 06:37:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 06:37:10 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jul 31 06:55:10 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Tue Jul 31 06:55:10 2012] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 11.902659 pixels away
[Tue Jul 31 06:55:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 31 06:55:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 31 06:55:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 31 06:55:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 31 06:55:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 31 06:55:10 2012] Source is confused with source 8
[Tue Jul 31 07:49:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 07:49:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.06"
[Tue Jul 31 07:49:19 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.137
[Tue Jul 31 07:49:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 10.06"
[Tue Jul 31 08:17:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 08:17:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 08:17:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jul 31 08:17:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 08:17:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 08:17:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0093670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jul 31 08:40:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Tue Jul 31 08:40:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 31 08:40:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 31 08:40:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 31 08:40:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 31 08:40:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 31 08:40:46 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9