[Sun Jul 22 10:24:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (260.8, 292.0) = 13 25 44.45 -43 0 8.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 71.9 +/- 16.5
  Background counts = 67.0
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jul 22 10:24:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.76'
[Sun Jul 22 10:31:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 22 10:31:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.81"
[Sun Jul 22 10:31:04 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.759
[Sun Jul 22 10:31:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 7.81"
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:24 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:35 2012] Source 96 is offset by -2.176534 and 0.588050 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.872000 x 0.872000, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:35 2012] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 97
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:35 2012] Source 96 is offset by 7.890225 and 5.161480 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.508846 x 1.508846, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:35 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9