[Sun Jul 22 10:27:01 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (316.4, 331.2) = 13 25 22.41 -42 57 19.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 101.0 +/- 13.9
  Background counts = 25.2
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007

[Sun Jul 22 10:27:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.71'
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.78"
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:41 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.192
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 41 for pass 0, mean size = 7.78"
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:12 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 359.770000, observed total counts = 358.000000
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 45 = 0.136382 pixels
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] 355.990200 total counts/ 298.671000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.316680
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 45 = 0.136382 pixels
  Position = (316.3, 331.2) = 13 25 22.47 -42 57 19.7
  Extent = 3.6 (2.9-4.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 57.3 +/- 18.9
  Background counts = 298.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0008
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 324.836000, observed total counts = 325.000000
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 45 = 0.031299 pixels
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 41 to 72
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] 324.626800 total counts/ 270.648000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.281110
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 45 = 0.031299 pixels
  Position = (316.3, 331.2) = 13 25 22.48 -42 57 19.8
  Extent = 3.9 (2.9-5.9)" x 3.3 (2.4-4.5)", rotation angle = 89 (87-90) degrees
  Source counts = 54.0 +/- 18.0
  Background counts = 270.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0008
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 23 00:54:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.63
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:29 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 3.60"
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:29 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.277
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 1, mean size = 3.60"
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.csv
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.csv
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:08 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 357.911000, observed total counts = 358.000000
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:45 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 45 = 0.027970 pixels
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:45 2012] 354.438900 total counts/ 296.665000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.354274
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 45 = 0.027970 pixels
  Position = (316.3, 331.2) = 13 25 22.47 -42 57 19.7
  Extent = 3.6 (2.9-4.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 57.8 +/- 18.8
  Background counts = 296.7
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0008
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0