[Sun Jul 22 10:26:00 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (261.1, 182.7) = 13 25 44.37 -43 8 5.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 80.2 +/- 12.0
  Background counts = 13.1
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007

[Sun Jul 22 10:26:00 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.81'
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.83"
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.006
[Sun Jul 22 18:53:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 37 for pass 0, mean size = 10.83"
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:39 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:39 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.csv
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:39 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:39 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.csv
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.csv
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.csv
[Sun Jul 22 21:48:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:47 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 214.111000, observed total counts = 194.000000
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:47 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 68
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:48 2012] Warning: source 61 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 68 at 11.296810 pixels away
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 23 00:53:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 23 05:45:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 23 05:45:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.83"
[Mon Jul 23 05:45:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.006
[Mon Jul 23 05:45:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 1, mean size = 10.83"
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.csv
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.csv
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Mon Jul 23 08:56:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:34 2012] Warning: source 35 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 68 at 12.901755 pixels away
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 23 13:51:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 24 02:59:43 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(22669.730774, 15850.553528, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jul 24 02:59:43 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68_src.reg
[Tue Jul 24 02:59:43 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (224, 145) - (299, 220)
[Tue Jul 24 02:59:43 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(22669.730774, 15850.553528, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jul 24 02:59:43 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68.gif
[Tue Jul 24 03:13:45 2012] Mean detx,y = (4745.44, 7216.19) 
[Tue Jul 24 03:13:46 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Jul 24 03:14:10 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Jul 24 03:14:10 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jul 24 03:14:10 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Jul 24 04:45:23 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 80 counts
[Tue Jul 24 04:45:23 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Jul 24 06:53:01 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Jul 24 06:53:01 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jul 24 06:53:02 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Jul 24 06:53:02 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.005, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0093650201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src68.arf
[Tue Jul 24 06:53:02 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Jul 24 06:53:02 2012] Updating source flux to 7.1e-14
[Tue Jul 24 06:53:06 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting