[Thu Sep 29 21:55:58 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.2, 287.7) = 2 40 39.27 -8 14 56.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 48.2 +/- 9.1
  Background counts = 11.6
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Thu Sep 29 21:55:58 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.19'
[Thu Sep 29 21:57:12 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Sep 29 21:57:12 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.02"
[Thu Sep 29 21:57:12 2011] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.754
[Thu Sep 29 21:57:12 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 9.02"
[Thu Sep 29 22:45:23 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 22:45:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Thu Sep 29 22:45:23 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 22:45:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Thu Sep 29 22:45:23 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep 29 22:45:23 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 22:45:23 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 22:45:23 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27 appears to have run properly
[Thu Sep 29 23:54:45 2011] Source 28 is offset by -6.730013 and 2.712333 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.904161 x 1.904161, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Sep 29 23:54:45 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Sep 29 23:54:45 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Sep 29 23:54:45 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Sep 29 23:54:45 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Sep 29 23:54:45 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Sep 29 23:54:45 2011] Source is confused with source 13
[Thu Sep 29 23:55:01 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Sep 29 23:55:01 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.02"
[Thu Sep 29 23:55:01 2011] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.754
[Thu Sep 29 23:55:01 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 26 for pass 1, mean size = 9.02"
[Fri Sep 30 00:39:37 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 00:39:37 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 00:39:37 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 30 00:39:37 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 00:39:37 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 00:39:37 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0093630101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 30 01:52:14 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 177.043000, observed total counts = 176.000000
[Fri Sep 30 01:52:14 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.544157 pixels
[Fri Sep 30 01:52:14 2011] 174.637700 total counts/ 158.242000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.303374
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.544157 pixels
  Position = (368.8, 288.0) = 2 40 39.40 -8 14 55.9
  Extent = 2.6 (2.3-5.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.4 +/- 13.2
  Background counts = 158.2
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability