[Mon Sep  3 21:57:12 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (306.6, 330.5) = 12 58 44.54 -1 40 55.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 119.0 +/- 21.5
  Background counts = 169.1
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Mon Sep  3 21:57:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.40'
[Mon Sep  3 22:01:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep  3 22:01:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.63"
[Mon Sep  3 22:01:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.231
[Mon Sep  3 22:01:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 0, mean size = 7.63"
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Tue Sep  4 02:08:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:40 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1879.070000, observed total counts = 1599.000000
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:40 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 53
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Sep  4 05:12:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep  4 05:12:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.63"
[Tue Sep  4 05:12:14 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.231
[Tue Sep  4 05:12:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 1, mean size = 7.63"
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.csv
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.csv
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:58 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Tue Sep  4 07:26:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:56 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1890.330000, observed total counts = 1599.000000
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:56 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 53
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:56 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:56 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:56 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:56 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:56 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:56 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9