[Mon Sep  3 21:58:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (102.1, 251.6) = 12 59 43.86 -1 46 38.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 82.4 +/- 13.2
  Background counts = 24.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Mon Sep  3 21:58:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.63'
[Tue Sep  4 03:35:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep  4 03:35:35 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Sep  4 03:35:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.74"
[Tue Sep  4 03:35:35 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 53, frac = 0.989
[Tue Sep  4 03:35:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 48 for pass 0, mean size = 13.74"
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.csv
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.csv
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Warning: source 48 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 37 at 16.253680 pixels away
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Sep  4 08:24:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep  4 08:24:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.74"
[Tue Sep  4 08:24:02 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 53, frac = 0.989
[Tue Sep  4 08:24:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 1, mean size = 13.74"
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.csv
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.csv
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Tue Sep  4 09:12:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 09:13:06 2012] Warning: source 34 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 37 at 16.770685 pixels away
[Tue Sep  4 09:13:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Sep  4 09:13:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Sep  4 09:13:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Sep  4 09:13:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Sep  4 09:13:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Sep  4 09:13:06 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9