[Mon Sep  3 21:58:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (285.8, 265.1) = 12 58 50.58 -1 45 39.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 370.1 +/- 30.5
  Background counts = 167.1
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.0008

[Mon Sep  3 21:58:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.59'
[Tue Sep  4 03:35:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Sep  4 03:35:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.72"
[Tue Sep  4 03:35:35 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.773
[Tue Sep  4 03:35:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.72"
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0093200101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 33
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2163.080000, observed total counts = 2168.000000
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 32 = 0.160684 pixels
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 28
[Tue Sep  4 05:11:59 2012] 2209.816700 total counts/ 2133.600000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.650037
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 32 = 0.160684 pixels
  Position = (285.7, 265.2) = 12 58 50.61 -1 45 40.1
  Extent = 3.0 (2.0-5.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 76.2 +/- 47.0
  Background counts = 2133.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability