[Tue May 22 23:15:10 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (155.9, 252.6) = 14 53 24.05 16 43 2.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 71.7 +/- 13.7 Background counts = 51.7 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005 [Tue May 22 23:15:11 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.86' [Tue May 22 23:19:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 22 23:19:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.86" [Tue May 22 23:19:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.009 [Tue May 22 23:19:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 0, mean size = 11.86" [Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg exists [Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv [Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv [Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 02:31:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists [Wed May 23 02:31:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv [Wed May 23 02:31:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 02:31:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv [Wed May 23 02:31:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Warning: source 34 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 36 at 15.939087 pixels away [Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 23 07:20:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 23 07:20:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.86" [Wed May 23 07:20:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.009 [Wed May 23 07:20:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 1, mean size = 11.86" [Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src27.ximg exists [Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src27.csv [Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src27_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src27.csv [Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src27_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 09:24:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists [Wed May 23 09:24:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27.csv [Wed May 23 09:24:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 09:24:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27.csv [Wed May 23 09:24:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Warning: source 27 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 36 at 15.787423 pixels away [Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9