[Tue May 22 23:15:10 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (290.8, 406.9) = 14 52 43.20 16 54 12.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 76.6 +/- 13.1
  Background counts = 54.7
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Tue May 22 23:15:11 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.88'
[Tue May 22 23:19:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 23:19:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.37"
[Tue May 22 23:19:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.902
[Tue May 22 23:19:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 10.37"
[Wed May 23 02:31:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 02:31:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 02:31:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 02:31:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 02:31:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 02:31:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 13
[Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 07:19:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 07:20:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 07:20:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.37"
[Wed May 23 07:20:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.902
[Wed May 23 07:20:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 10.37"
[Wed May 23 09:24:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 09:24:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Wed May 23 09:24:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 09:24:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Wed May 23 09:24:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Wed May 23 09:24:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0091140201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 11.146210 pixels away
[Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 15:10:51 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9