[Mon Jun 17 09:54:55 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (203.2, 357.9) = 14 18 30.53 25 10 50.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 805.8 +/- 36.9
  Background counts = 77.0
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.0008

[Mon Jun 17 09:54:56 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.14'
[Mon Jun 17 11:41:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 11:41:55 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon Jun 17 11:41:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.50"
[Mon Jun 17 11:41:55 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 34, frac = 1.001
[Mon Jun 17 11:41:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 10.50"
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Warning, spatial fit 2 centroid is now closest to src. 21
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Source 5 is offset by -8.565695 and 3.676718 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.220874 x 1.220874, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Source is confused with source 4
[Mon Jun 17 14:15:35 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 14:15:35 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon Jun 17 14:15:35 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.50"
[Mon Jun 17 14:15:35 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 34, frac = 1.001
[Mon Jun 17 14:15:35 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 10.50"
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3178.680000, observed total counts = 2798.000000
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Source 5 is offset by -8.565695 and 3.676718 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.220874 x 1.220874, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 16:33:29 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(17630.012573, 31089.646423, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 17 16:33:29 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src.reg
[Mon Jun 17 16:33:29 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (166, 320) - (241, 395)
[Mon Jun 17 16:33:29 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(17630.012573, 31089.646423, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17549.969200, 33064.547400, 582.049617, 280.584808, 305.361000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17568.577850, 31536.700256, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 17 16:33:29 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.gif
[Mon Jun 17 16:37:48 2013] Mean detx,y = (5912.04, 7001.37) 
[Mon Jun 17 16:37:49 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Mon Jun 17 16:38:11 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Mon Jun 17 16:38:11 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon Jun 17 16:38:11 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_bgd.pi.gz
[Mon Jun 17 16:54:52 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Mon Jun 17 16:54:52 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:03 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:03 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz = 2188.00
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:03 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_bgd.pi.gz = 2763.00
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:03 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1043358.000000, 6320997.000000
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:03 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (203.2, 357.9) = 14 18 30.53 25 10 50.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = 1731.9 +/- 47.8
  Background aperture counts = 456.1
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Jun 17 17:15:03 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:03 2013] Set source signif. to 1731.93/21.36 = 81.10
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:07 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:07 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0219, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.arf
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:07 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:07 2013] Updating source flux to 4.3e-13
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:09 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Mon Jun 17 17:15:13 2013] xmm0089960301/analysis//spectral/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete