[Mon Jun 17 09:54:56 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (342.0, 243.7) = 14 17 46.05 25 2 38.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 108.7 +/- 15.9
  Background counts = 73.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Mon Jun 17 09:54:56 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.07'
[Mon Jun 17 11:41:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 11:41:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.97"
[Mon Jun 17 11:41:55 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.915
[Mon Jun 17 11:41:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 8.97"
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 666.458000, observed total counts = 574.000000
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 34
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 12:52:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 14:15:35 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 14:15:35 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.97"
[Mon Jun 17 14:15:35 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.915
[Mon Jun 17 14:15:35 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 8.97"
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 34 at 11.473109 pixels away
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 15:23:28 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9