[Fri May 17 01:17:00 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (365.8, 180.3) = 5 36 6.54 -6 32 18.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 187.2 +/- 18.5 Background counts = 54.7 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0004 [Fri May 17 01:17:00 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.86' [Fri May 17 01:23:50 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 17 01:23:50 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.36" [Fri May 17 01:23:50 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.930 [Fri May 17 01:23:50 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 88 for pass 0, mean size = 11.36" [Fri May 17 06:47:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg exists [Fri May 17 06:47:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv [Fri May 17 06:47:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg exists [Fri May 17 06:47:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv [Fri May 17 06:47:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 17 06:47:04 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg exists [Fri May 17 06:47:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.csv [Fri May 17 06:47:04 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg exists [Fri May 17 06:47:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.csv [Fri May 17 06:47:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 17 12:36:45 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 998.920000, observed total counts = 908.000000 [Fri May 17 12:36:45 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 91 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri May 17 12:36:45 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 978.003000, observed total counts = 887.000000 [Fri May 17 12:36:45 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 91 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri May 17 12:36:45 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 17 12:36:45 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 17 12:36:45 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 17 12:36:45 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 17 12:36:45 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 17 12:37:41 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 17 12:37:41 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.36" [Fri May 17 12:37:41 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.930 [Fri May 17 12:37:41 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 86 for pass 1, mean size = 11.36" [Fri May 17 16:16:13 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86.ximg exists [Fri May 17 16:16:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86.csv [Fri May 17 16:16:13 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86_1.ximg exists [Fri May 17 16:16:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86.csv [Fri May 17 16:16:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src86.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 17 16:16:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86.ximg exists [Fri May 17 16:16:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86.csv [Fri May 17 16:16:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86_1.ximg exists [Fri May 17 16:16:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86.csv [Fri May 17 16:16:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src86.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 17 21:10:56 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 999.522000, observed total counts = 908.000000 [Fri May 17 21:10:56 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 91 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri May 17 21:10:56 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 978.003000, observed total counts = 887.000000 [Fri May 17 21:10:56 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 91 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri May 17 21:10:56 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 17 21:10:56 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 17 21:10:56 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 17 21:10:56 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 17 21:10:56 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 17 21:11:47 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(31774.163422, 15637.896301, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri May 17 21:11:47 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91_src.reg [Fri May 17 21:11:47 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (328, 143) - (403, 218) [Fri May 17 21:11:47 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(31774.163422, 15637.896301, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30073.131287, 13793.223099, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30792.726532, 13849.823013, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31876.251953, 16287.909866, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri May 17 21:11:47 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91.gif [Fri May 17 22:59:15 2013] Mean detx,y = (4557.76, 11815.56) [Fri May 17 22:59:18 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Fri May 17 22:59:49 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Fri May 17 22:59:49 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri May 17 22:59:49 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91_bgd.pi.gz [Sat May 18 00:26:22 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sat May 18 00:26:22 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat May 18 05:46:35 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat May 18 05:46:35 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91_src_b10.pi.gz = 428.00 [Sat May 18 05:46:35 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91_bgd.pi.gz = 1666.00 [Sat May 18 05:46:35 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1052886.000000, 7321630.000000 [Sat May 18 05:46:35 2013] User source parameters: Position = (365.8, 180.3) = 5 36 6.54 -6 32 18.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = 188.4 +/- 21.7 Background aperture counts = 239.6 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005 [Sat May 18 05:46:35 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Sat May 18 05:46:35 2013] Set source signif. to 188.42/15.48 = 12.17 [Sat May 18 05:46:42 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat May 18 05:46:42 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00433, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91.arf [Sat May 18 05:46:42 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat May 18 05:46:42 2013] Updating source flux to 3.7e-14 [Sat May 18 05:48:49 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Sat May 18 05:49:43 2013] xmm0089940301/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete