[Fri May 17 01:18:56 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (325.0, 268.2) = 5 36 18.43 -6 25 55.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 71.7 +/- 13.0 Background counts = 32.2 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003 [Fri May 17 01:18:57 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.92' [Fri May 17 09:45:18 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 17 09:45:18 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.89" [Fri May 17 09:45:18 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.747 [Fri May 17 09:45:18 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 70 for pass 0, mean size = 7.89" [Fri May 17 12:36:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg exists [Fri May 17 12:36:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv [Fri May 17 12:36:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg exists [Fri May 17 12:36:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv [Fri May 17 12:36:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 17 12:36:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.ximg exists [Fri May 17 12:36:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.csv [Fri May 17 12:36:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg exists [Fri May 17 12:36:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.csv [Fri May 17 12:36:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 17 12:37:16 2013] Source 65 is offset by 5.379141 and 2.646367 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.009416 x 1.009416, not incorporating fit results [Fri May 17 12:37:16 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 277.893000, observed total counts = 250.000000 [Fri May 17 12:37:16 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 65 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri May 17 12:37:17 2013] Warning: source 74 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 65 at 11.354398 pixels away [Fri May 17 12:37:17 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 17 12:37:17 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 17 12:37:17 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 17 12:37:17 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 17 12:37:17 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 17 18:28:33 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 17 18:28:33 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.89" [Fri May 17 18:28:33 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.747 [Fri May 17 18:28:33 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 70 for pass 1, mean size = 7.89" [Fri May 17 21:10:37 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.ximg exists [Fri May 17 21:10:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.csv [Fri May 17 21:10:37 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70_1.ximg exists [Fri May 17 21:10:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.csv [Fri May 17 21:10:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 17 21:10:38 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.ximg exists [Fri May 17 21:10:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.csv [Fri May 17 21:10:38 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg exists [Fri May 17 21:10:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.csv [Fri May 17 21:10:38 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 17 21:11:22 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 277.892000, observed total counts = 250.000000 [Fri May 17 21:11:22 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 65 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri May 17 21:11:22 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 17 21:11:22 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 17 21:11:22 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 17 21:11:22 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 17 21:11:22 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat May 18 02:52:23 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28230.469269, 23281.449524, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat May 18 02:52:23 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src65_src.reg [Sat May 18 02:52:23 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (288, 231) - (363, 306) [Sat May 18 02:52:24 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28230.469269, 23281.449524, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27082.981200, 21964.067400, 385.281611, 329.277609, 49.836900, X, Y) && !ellipse(25777.588580, 22595.875200, 407.276012, 344.676010, 358.690990, X, Y) && !ellipse(26582.237640, 23831.938000, 393.996811, 393.996811, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26582.097540, 23829.708000, 402.785612, 402.785612, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27215.886993, 23085.144623, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25756.323800, 24442.375000, 396.620011, 396.620011, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31249.450000, 22875.812000, 1464.632042, 1464.632042, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29120.169586, 21573.194382, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat May 18 02:52:24 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src65.gif [Sat May 18 03:38:44 2013] Mean detx,y = (-1112.52, -4315.16) [Sat May 18 03:38:46 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat May 18 03:38:56 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat May 18 03:38:57 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src65_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat May 18 03:38:57 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src65_bgd.pi.gz [Sat May 18 05:39:07 2013] Not generating rmf since there are only 71 counts [Sat May 18 05:39:07 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat May 18 05:47:34 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat May 18 05:47:34 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src65_src_b10.pi.gz = 189.00 [Sat May 18 05:47:34 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src65_bgd.pi.gz = 1237.00 [Sat May 18 05:47:34 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1231012.000000, 6516404.000000 [Sat May 18 05:47:34 2013] User source parameters: Position = (325.0, 268.2) = 5 36 18.43 -6 25 55.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = -44.7 +/- 14.8 Background aperture counts = 233.7 Rate = -0.0009 +/- 0.0003 [Sat May 18 05:47:34 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Sat May 18 05:47:34 2013] Set source signif. to -44.68/15.29 = -2.92 [Sat May 18 05:47:40 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat May 18 05:47:40 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=-0.000937, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src65.arf [Sat May 18 05:47:40 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat May 18 05:47:40 2013] Updated flux is not positive, keeping original flux [Sat May 18 05:48:18 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Sat May 18 05:48:49 2013] xmm0089940301/analysis//spectral/fullrun_mos2_xmm0089940301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src65_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete