[Sun May 20 10:41:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (282.0, 372.0) = 13 47 37.77 -32 48 1.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 191.7 +/- 38.5
  Background counts = 753.4
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002

[Sun May 20 10:41:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.46'
[Sun May 20 10:50:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.16 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 10:50:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.16"
[Sun May 20 10:50:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.325
[Sun May 20 10:50:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 0, mean size = 9.16"
[Sun May 20 17:24:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 17:24:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Sun May 20 17:24:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 17:24:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Sun May 20 17:24:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 17:24:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 17:24:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.csv
[Sun May 20 17:24:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 17:24:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.csv
[Sun May 20 17:24:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 01:02:27 2012] Source 42 is offset by 8.419391 and -5.338527 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.166363 x 2.166363, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 01:02:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 01:02:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 01:02:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 01:02:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 01:02:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 21 01:02:28 2012] Source is confused with source 46
[Mon May 21 01:03:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.16 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 01:03:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.16"
[Mon May 21 01:03:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.325
[Mon May 21 01:03:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 9.16"
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Mon May 21 04:51:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0086950201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 11:53:22 2012] Source 42 is offset by 2.529851 and -5.713102 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.052910 x 1.052910, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 11:53:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 11:53:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 11:53:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 11:53:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 11:53:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 21 11:53:22 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9