[Wed May  8 02:31:59 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (402.6, 295.0) = 3 19 14.32 41 29 21.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 260.2 +/- 54.6
  Background counts = 937.6
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Wed May  8 02:32:06 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.56'
[Wed May  8 03:00:42 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May  8 03:00:42 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.21"
[Wed May  8 03:00:42 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.771
[Wed May  8 03:00:42 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 98 for pass 0, mean size = 10.21"
[Thu May  9 08:51:40 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 08:51:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Thu May  9 08:51:40 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 08:51:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Thu May  9 08:51:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  9 08:51:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 08:51:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Thu May  9 08:51:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  9 08:51:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Thu May  9 08:51:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 11 11:23:51 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 5481.320000, observed total counts = 4621.000000
[Sat May 11 11:23:51 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 110
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 11 11:23:51 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 11 11:23:51 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 11 11:23:51 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 11 11:23:51 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 11 11:23:51 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 11 11:25:00 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 11 11:25:00 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.21"
[Sat May 11 11:25:00 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.771
[Sat May 11 11:25:00 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 1, mean size = 10.21"
[Sun May 12 15:03:57 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 15:03:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.csv
[Sun May 12 15:03:57 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 15:03:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.csv
[Sun May 12 15:03:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 12 15:04:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 15:04:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Sun May 12 15:04:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 15:04:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Sun May 12 15:04:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 8257.500000, observed total counts = 7626.000000
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 110 = 5.793993 pixels
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 85 to 46
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] 7978.403000 total counts/ 7767.630000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.391502
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 110 = 5.793993 pixels
  Position = (402.8, 300.8) = 3 19 14.25 41 29 46.1
  Extent = 20.0 (19.8-39.9)", rotation angle = 94 (91-97) degrees
  Source counts = 210.8 +/- 89.3
  Background counts = 7767.6
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.003
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 5484.800000, observed total counts = 4621.000000
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 110
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 5.48
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Source is asymmetric
[Thu May 16 20:39:29 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9