[Wed May  8 02:32:25 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (395.9, 306.5) = 3 19 16.92 41 30 2.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 375.9 +/- 37.1
  Background counts = 899.3
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Wed May  8 02:32:36 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.09'
[Thu May  9 08:51:42 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  9 08:51:42 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.97"
[Thu May  9 08:51:42 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.737
[Thu May  9 08:51:42 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 0, mean size = 9.97"
[Fri May 10 06:57:17 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.ximg exists
[Fri May 10 06:57:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.csv
[Fri May 10 06:57:17 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 10 06:57:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.csv
[Fri May 10 06:57:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 10 06:57:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists
[Fri May 10 06:57:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63.csv
[Fri May 10 06:57:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 10 06:57:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63.csv
[Fri May 10 06:57:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 11 11:24:14 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 45978.500000, observed total counts = 16790.000000
[Sat May 11 11:24:14 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 84
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 11 11:24:14 2013] Warning, spatial fit 63 centroid is now closest to src. 86
[Sat May 11 11:24:14 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 11 11:24:14 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 11 11:24:14 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 11 11:24:14 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 11 11:24:14 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 12 15:04:00 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 12 15:04:00 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.97"
[Sun May 12 15:04:00 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.737
[Sun May 12 15:04:00 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 1, mean size = 9.97"
[Tue May 14 07:34:24 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 07:34:24 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Tue May 14 07:34:24 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 07:34:24 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Tue May 14 07:34:24 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 07:34:28 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 07:34:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Tue May 14 07:34:28 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 07:34:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Tue May 14 07:34:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 16 20:39:51 2013] Warning: source 60 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 84 at 12.274933 pixels away
[Thu May 16 20:39:51 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 8424.740000, observed total counts = 10189.000000
[Thu May 16 20:39:51 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 84
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 16 20:39:51 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 16 20:39:51 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 16 20:39:51 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 16 20:39:51 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 16 20:39:51 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 16 23:21:33 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(34395.723419, 26614.788361, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Thu May 16 23:21:33 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84_src.reg
[Thu May 16 23:21:33 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (358, 269) - (433, 344)
[Thu May 16 23:21:33 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(34395.723419, 26614.788361, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29653.904000, 28004.068000, 3887.616112, 3887.616112, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29347.404000, 29534.910400, 7825.872225, 7825.872225, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29176.884000, 28272.938000, 3842.472111, 3842.472111, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28729.774000, 28970.410000, 3892.008112, 3892.008112, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31657.194000, 28041.594000, 1808.512052, 547.544016, 5.342870, X, Y) && !ellipse(34008.301544, 27964.127350, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33269.563538, 29418.063873, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33494.628000, 27956.432000, 269.548008, 269.548008, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31511.050000, 30084.610000, 1467.520042, 918.992026, 6.024810, X, Y) && !ellipse(31605.303558, 24895.157745, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32480.464000, 29838.560000, 1503.296043, 670.974419, 8.330760, X, Y) && !ellipse(32298.660000, 28558.156000, 1502.184043, 370.652811, 6.421970, X, Y) && !ellipse(32177.462372, 25314.758575, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31710.826000, 29012.238000, 1503.296043, 964.392028, 8.250280, X, Y) && !ellipse(32705.810547, 28003.862518, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32196.965800, 29975.766260, 2316.928067, 714.849621, 0.935121, X, Y) && !ellipse(31891.298000, 24795.878000, 1447.952042, 501.273614, 2.984200, X, Y) && !ellipse(33706.528000, 29685.520000, 1582.360046, 1248.168036, 42.454500, X, Y) && !ellipse(32611.052000, 25524.893600, 1447.952042, 743.519221, 7.179340, X, Y) && !ellipse(33839.831970, 25165.822052, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33547.617200, 29905.672000, 1599.800046, 530.377615, 10.142000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32742.301270, 26571.628204, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33026.134521, 27356.563721, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33321.252400, 26096.908000, 1513.576044, 494.363214, 90.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33662.546000, 28704.008000, 1036.416030, 1036.416030, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33470.756348, 27270.867340, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34059.437408, 27266.935242, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33493.394000, 26127.852000, 1278.360037, 1278.360037, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32501.020000, 31718.892000, 3102.032089, 2220.824064, 23.964100, X, Y) && !ellipse(34277.518860, 28610.956207, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Thu May 16 23:21:33 2013] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84.gif
[Fri May 17 04:15:24 2013] Mean detx,y = (499.28, 6950.47) 
[Fri May 17 04:15:28 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri May 17 04:16:02 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri May 17 04:16:02 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri May 17 04:16:02 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0085110101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src84_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May 19 10:55:13 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May 19 10:55:13 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts