[Fri Jul 27 05:31:42 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (248.0, 209.0) = 2 48 12.91 -3 36 57.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 40.1 +/- 8.5
  Background counts = 10.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Fri Jul 27 05:31:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.44'
[Fri Jul 27 08:08:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jul 27 08:08:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.15"
[Fri Jul 27 08:08:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.903
[Fri Jul 27 08:08:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 10.15"
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 224.604000, observed total counts = 153.000000
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:44 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 31
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:44 2012] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 34
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 27 09:10:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 27 10:31:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jul 27 10:31:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.15"
[Fri Jul 27 10:31:08 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.903
[Fri Jul 27 10:31:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 10.15"
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0084230501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:30 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 177.048000, observed total counts = 133.000000
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:30 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 31
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 27 11:59:30 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9