[Tue Jul 17 10:18:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (362.9, 135.5) = 0 36 53.15 8 56 26.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 34.3 +/- 8.3
  Background counts = 10.4
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Jul 17 10:18:16 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.70'
[Tue Jul 17 12:14:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 17 12:14:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.78"
[Tue Jul 17 12:14:36 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.698
[Tue Jul 17 12:14:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 0, mean size = 12.78"
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:41 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:41 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Tue Jul 17 14:36:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 17 16:43:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 142.534000, observed total counts = 96.000000
[Tue Jul 17 16:43:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 53
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 17 16:43:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 17 16:43:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 17 16:43:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 17 16:43:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 17 16:43:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 17 18:16:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 17 18:16:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.78"
[Tue Jul 17 18:16:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.698
[Tue Jul 17 18:16:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 41 for pass 1, mean size = 12.78"
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:41 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41.csv
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:41 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41.csv
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Tue Jul 17 19:59:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0084230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 36 centroid is now closest to src. 27
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 38 centroid is now closest to src. 42
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 40 centroid is now closest to src. 14
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 142.534000, observed total counts = 96.000000
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 53
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 17 21:26:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9