[Fri Aug 17 02:09:40 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (374.2, 388.7) = 2 8 18.12 35 28 43.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 45.9 +/- 11.6
  Background counts = 33.8
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Fri Aug 17 02:09:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.54'
[Fri Aug 17 02:11:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 02:11:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.70"
[Fri Aug 17 02:11:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.027
[Fri Aug 17 02:11:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 0, mean size = 10.70"
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21 appears to have run properly
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Source 22 is offset by 1.929794 and 3.422103 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.160414 x 1.160414, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 162.823000, observed total counts = 154.000000
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 22 = 1.282793 pixels
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] 162.826600 total counts/ 134.856000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.408611
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 22 = 1.282793 pixels
  Position = (373.2, 389.5) = 2 8 18.48 35 28 45.8
  Extent = 10.1" x 2.4", rotation angle = 28
  Source counts = 28.0 +/- 12.8
  Background counts = 134.9
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 4.16
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:17 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9