[Fri Aug 17 02:09:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (397.7, 334.4) = 2 8 9.79 35 24 45.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 28.4 +/- 7.2
  Background counts = 7.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006

[Fri Aug 17 02:09:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.65'
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.26"
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.735
[Fri Aug 17 02:44:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 10.26"
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Fri Aug 17 03:09:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:21 2012] Source 11 is offset by -7.805178 and -0.096525 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.808239 x 1.808239, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 102.424000, observed total counts = 92.000000
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:21 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 03:39:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 17 04:13:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 04:13:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.26"
[Fri Aug 17 04:13:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.735
[Fri Aug 17 04:13:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 10.26"
[Fri Aug 17 04:33:30 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 04:33:30 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 04:33:30 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16 appears to have run properly
[Fri Aug 17 04:33:30 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 04:33:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 17 04:33:30 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 04:33:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri Aug 17 04:33:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0084140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 05:01:52 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 99.277800, observed total counts = 92.000000
[Fri Aug 17 05:01:52 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.114467 pixels
[Fri Aug 17 05:01:52 2012] 102.981200 total counts/ 81.988300 bgd. counts: snr = 2.318443
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.114467 pixels
  Position = (397.6, 334.3) = 2 8 9.83 35 24 45.7
  Extent = 6.2 (4.1-10.2)" x 2.9 (2.6-5.0)", rotation angle = 360 (360-20) degrees
  Source counts = 21.0 +/- 10.1
  Background counts = 82.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0006
[Fri Aug 17 05:01:52 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 05:01:52 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 05:01:52 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Aug 17 05:01:52 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 05:01:52 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.82
[Fri Aug 17 05:01:52 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9