[Sat Jul 14 18:27:20 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (315.4, 311.0) = 17 30 32.96 -21 26 57.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 237.3 +/- 30.2
  Background counts = 210.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jul 14 18:27:21 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.53'
[Sat Jul 14 18:35:03 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul 14 18:35:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.19"
[Sat Jul 14 18:35:03 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.916
[Sat Jul 14 18:35:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 7.19"
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Sat Jul 14 23:02:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:03 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 31
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:03 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3201.980000, observed total counts = 2736.000000
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:03 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 21
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:03 2012] Source is confused with source 11
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.19"
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.916
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 7.19"
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon Jul 16 04:03:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:39 2012] Source 21 is offset by -6.089288 and -7.614954 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.613977 x 6.613977, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:39 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9