[Sat Jul 14 18:28:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (308.5, 252.4) = 17 30 35.10 -21 31 10.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 171.6 +/- 22.1
  Background counts = 78.7
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jul 14 18:28:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.41'
[Sun Jul 15 09:16:46 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 09:16:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.14"
[Sun Jul 15 09:16:46 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.756
[Sun Jul 15 09:16:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 8.14"
[Sun Jul 15 17:35:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 17:35:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 17:35:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jul 15 17:35:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 17:35:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Sun Jul 15 17:35:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 17:35:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Sun Jul 15 17:35:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:15 2012] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 30 at 11.347404 pixels away
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 15 17:36:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 16 12:06:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 16 12:06:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.14"
[Mon Jul 16 12:06:30 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.756
[Mon Jul 16 12:06:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 8.14"
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:34 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:35 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0084100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:45 2012] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 30 at 18.915301 pixels away
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:45 2012] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 30 at 11.347404 pixels away
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 23 13:48:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9