[Thu Jun 21 16:23:40 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (382.2, 305.3) = 13 51 37.79 69 18 3.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 175.1 +/- 21.9 Background counts = 107.9 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001 [Thu Jun 21 16:23:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.09' [Thu Jun 21 16:28:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jun 21 16:28:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.48" [Thu Jun 21 16:28:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.871 [Thu Jun 21 16:28:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 9.48" [Thu Jun 21 19:37:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists [Thu Jun 21 19:37:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv [Thu Jun 21 19:37:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 21 19:37:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv [Thu Jun 21 19:37:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 21 19:37:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists [Thu Jun 21 19:37:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 21 19:37:25 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28 appears to have run properly [Thu Jun 21 21:56:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 28 centroid is now closest to src. 8 [Thu Jun 21 21:56:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Jun 21 21:56:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Jun 21 21:56:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Jun 21 21:56:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Jun 21 21:56:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Jun 21 21:57:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jun 21 21:57:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.48" [Thu Jun 21 21:57:01 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.871 [Thu Jun 21 21:57:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 1, mean size = 9.48" [Thu Jun 21 23:57:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg exists [Thu Jun 21 23:57:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv [Thu Jun 21 23:57:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 21 23:57:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv [Thu Jun 21 23:57:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 21 23:57:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists [Thu Jun 21 23:57:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 21 23:57:06 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25 appears to have run properly [Fri Jun 22 01:16:25 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 28 at 11.020848 pixels away [Fri Jun 22 01:16:25 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 28 at 32.497499 pixels away [Fri Jun 22 01:16:25 2012] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 28 at 53.073663 pixels away [Fri Jun 22 01:16:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 586.360000, observed total counts = 586.000000 [Fri Jun 22 01:16:26 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.201355 pixels [Fri Jun 22 01:16:26 2012] 595.345400 total counts/ 535.586000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.582210 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.201355 pixels Position = (382.0, 305.2) = 13 51 37.95 69 18 3.5 Extent = 4.1 (3.0-5.5)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 59.8 +/- 24.4 Background counts = 535.6 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001 [Fri Jun 22 01:16:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jun 22 01:16:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jun 22 01:16:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Fri Jun 22 01:16:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jun 22 01:16:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jun 22 01:16:26 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9