[Thu Jun 21 16:24:23 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (187.1, 479.4) = 13 54 18.76 69 30 41.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 94.5 +/- 14.5
  Background counts = 28.7
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Thu Jun 21 16:24:23 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.40'
[Thu Jun 21 19:37:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 21 19:37:26 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Thu Jun 21 19:37:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.13"
[Thu Jun 21 19:37:26 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 56, frac = 0.997
[Thu Jun 21 19:37:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 14.13"
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Thu Jun 21 20:05:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 21 21:56:48 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 17.455884 pixels away
[Thu Jun 21 21:56:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 21 21:56:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 21 21:56:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 21 21:56:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 21 21:56:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 21 23:57:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 21 23:57:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.13"
[Thu Jun 21 23:57:06 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 56, frac = 0.997
[Thu Jun 21 23:57:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 14.13"
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Fri Jun 22 00:11:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0083960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 22 01:16:27 2012] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 17.460043 pixels away
[Fri Jun 22 01:16:27 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 22 01:16:27 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 22 01:16:27 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 22 01:16:27 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 22 01:16:27 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 22 01:16:27 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9