[Tue Dec 20 22:52:58 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (291.7, 122.1) = 17 3 54.61 -38 2 2.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 151.3 +/- 18.5 Background counts = 18.4 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0006 [Tue Dec 20 22:52:59 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.79' [Wed Dec 21 01:27:12 2011] Using EEF radius (= 12.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Dec 21 01:27:12 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.83" [Wed Dec 21 01:27:12 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 46, frac = 0.967 [Wed Dec 21 01:27:12 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 12.83" [Wed Dec 21 04:23:42 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists [Wed Dec 21 04:23:42 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Wed Dec 21 04:23:42 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists [Wed Dec 21 04:23:42 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Wed Dec 21 04:23:42 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Dec 21 04:23:42 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Wed Dec 21 04:23:42 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Wed Dec 21 04:23:42 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly [Wed Dec 21 04:24:04 2011] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 4 [Wed Dec 21 04:24:04 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Dec 21 04:24:04 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Dec 21 04:24:04 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Dec 21 04:24:04 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Dec 21 04:24:04 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Dec 21 04:24:04 2011] Source is confused with source 11 [Wed Dec 21 07:08:56 2011] Using EEF radius (= 12.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Dec 21 07:08:56 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.83" [Wed Dec 21 07:08:56 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 46, frac = 0.967 [Wed Dec 21 07:08:56 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 12.83" [Wed Dec 21 08:13:56 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists [Wed Dec 21 08:13:56 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists [Wed Dec 21 08:13:56 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8 appears to have run properly [Wed Dec 21 08:13:56 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Wed Dec 21 08:13:57 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Wed Dec 21 08:13:57 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0083280201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly [Wed Dec 21 08:14:15 2011] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 13 at 11.223390 pixels away [Wed Dec 21 08:14:15 2011] Source 13 is offset by 7.212973 and 6.402026 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 3.925591 x 3.925591, not incorporating fit results [Wed Dec 21 08:14:15 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Dec 21 08:14:15 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Dec 21 08:14:15 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Dec 21 08:14:15 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Dec 21 08:14:15 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Dec 21 08:14:15 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9