[Tue Jun 12 00:50:32 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (259.8, 299.7) = 18 56 16.55 1 16 0.2 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 138.2 +/- 30.9 Background counts = 455.0 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.002 [Tue Jun 12 00:50:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.80' [Tue Jun 12 00:54:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jun 12 00:54:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.83" [Tue Jun 12 00:54:41 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.181 [Tue Jun 12 00:54:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 0, mean size = 7.83" [Tue Jun 12 04:33:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.ximg exists [Tue Jun 12 04:33:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.csv [Tue Jun 12 04:33:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 12 04:33:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.csv [Tue Jun 12 04:33:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 12 04:33:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists [Tue Jun 12 04:33:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.csv [Tue Jun 12 04:33:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 12 04:33:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.csv [Tue Jun 12 04:33:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 12 09:08:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3773.310000, observed total counts = 3385.000000 [Tue Jun 12 09:08:18 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 89 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Jun 12 09:08:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jun 12 09:08:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jun 12 09:08:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jun 12 09:08:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jun 12 09:08:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jun 12 09:08:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jun 12 09:08:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.83" [Tue Jun 12 09:08:53 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.181 [Tue Jun 12 09:08:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 1, mean size = 7.83" [Tue Jun 12 13:38:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg exists [Tue Jun 12 13:38:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv [Tue Jun 12 13:38:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 12 13:38:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv [Tue Jun 12 13:38:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 12 13:38:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists [Tue Jun 12 13:38:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv [Tue Jun 12 13:38:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 12 13:38:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv [Tue Jun 12 13:38:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 12 20:29:22 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3771.830000, observed total counts = 3385.000000 [Tue Jun 12 20:29:22 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 89 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Jun 12 20:29:22 2012] Source 89 is offset by -6.466470 and -0.518991 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.906501 x 0.906501, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jun 12 20:29:22 2012] Source 89 is offset by -6.672608 and 1.274871 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.369770 x 1.369770, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jun 12 20:29:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jun 12 20:29:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jun 12 20:29:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jun 12 20:29:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jun 12 20:29:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jun 12 20:30:09 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(22552.843109, 26028.273804, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jun 12 20:30:09 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src.reg [Tue Jun 12 20:30:09 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (222, 262) - (297, 337) [Tue Jun 12 20:30:09 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(22552.843109, 26028.273804, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22053.410000, 30984.538000, 2840.080082, 2840.080082, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20218.615692, 27886.605804, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20919.029678, 27864.476135, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21144.176000, 27413.036000, 875.296025, 875.296025, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21458.400208, 26385.348694, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19952.086594, 26126.886902, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20605.238000, 26062.295060, 1385.456040, 1283.904037, 227.033000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20591.314000, 26142.952000, 1171.072034, 1171.072034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19701.974869, 25774.267151, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22461.796844, 25353.179504, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22176.320000, 24907.426000, 953.360027, 953.360027, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20101.755905, 24924.214386, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21629.759781, 24496.218353, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20916.783524, 23963.388489, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20225.564000, 24539.996000, 1386.328040, 1386.328040, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22592.631378, 23882.279999, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20629.663345, 23450.317352, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23527.745972, 23371.093933, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21662.884400, 23907.914000, 1329.048038, 1329.048038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22755.546631, 23112.000244, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jun 12 20:30:09 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89.gif [Tue Jun 12 21:20:11 2012] Mean detx,y = (-4473.77, 1685.86) [Tue Jun 12 21:20:12 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue Jun 12 21:20:22 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue Jun 12 21:20:23 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Jun 12 21:20:23 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_bgd.pi.gz [Tue Jun 12 22:35:39 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue Jun 12 22:35:39 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed Jun 13 03:01:11 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed Jun 13 03:01:11 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Jun 13 03:01:13 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed Jun 13 03:01:13 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00738, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0083270401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89.arf [Wed Jun 13 03:01:13 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed Jun 13 03:01:13 2012] Updating source flux to 2.5e-14 [Wed Jun 13 03:14:14 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting