[Sun May  5 00:51:52 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (344.0, 290.3) = 23 36 22.41 21 7 5.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 103.2 +/- 15.5
  Background counts = 110.9
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sun May  5 00:51:52 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.36'
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.11"
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.671
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 8.11"
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Warning, spatial fit 25 centroid is now closest to src. 32
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source 26 is offset by -0.283586 and -1.039211 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.913126 x 0.913126, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.11"
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.671
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 8.11"
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0