[Sun May  5 00:51:52 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (287.4, 314.8) = 23 36 40.00 21 8 58.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 84.6 +/- 14.4
  Background counts = 74.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sun May  5 00:51:52 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.43'
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.14"
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.599
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 0, mean size = 7.14"
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Warning, spatial fit 21 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source is confused with source 20
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.14"
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.599
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 7.14"
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Source 22 is offset by 1.944534 and -0.476521 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.884469 x 1.884469, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9