[Sun May  5 00:51:52 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (289.0, 321.2) = 23 36 39.52 21 9 19.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 85.5 +/- 14.0
  Background counts = 77.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sun May  5 00:51:52 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.78'
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.32"
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.577
[Sun May  5 00:53:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 7.32"
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Sun May  5 01:59:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source 20 is offset by 6.710582 and -7.025111 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.460345 x 0.841439, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May  5 04:50:55 2013] Source is confused with source 22
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.32"
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.577
[Sun May  5 04:51:17 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 7.32"
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Sun May  5 05:34:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0083150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 22
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May  5 07:32:02 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9