[Mon Jun 17 00:55:02 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (453.8, 170.3) = 20 47 0.65 30 3 39.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 108.5 +/- 20.6
  Background counts = 112.7
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Mon Jun 17 00:55:09 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.60'
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:50 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:50 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.73"
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:50 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 55, frac = 1.028
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:50 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 13.73"
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2397.920000, observed total counts = 1959.000000
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 38
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Warning: source 89 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 38 at 17.816562 pixels away
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Source is confused with source 28
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.73"
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:53 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 55, frac = 1.028
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 1, mean size = 13.73"
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:36 2013] Warning: source 71 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 38 at 14.853872 pixels away
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9