[Mon Jun 17 00:54:59 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (503.0, 283.9) = 20 46 44.07 30 11 48.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 112.5 +/- 20.7
  Background counts = 104.1
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Mon Jun 17 00:55:09 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.87'
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:50 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:50 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.86"
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:50 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.177
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:50 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 86 for pass 0, mean size = 13.86"
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:56:57 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Source 11 is offset by 2.971472 and -1.232517 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.602253 x 1.602253, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Warning: source 86 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 10.481193 pixels away
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 00:58:49 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.86"
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:53 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.177
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 1, mean size = 13.86"
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:59:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:36 2013] Warning: source 68 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 13.709520 pixels away
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 01:01:37 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9