[Wed Aug  8 15:11:06 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (346.0, 187.8) = 20 51 25.82 30 51 11.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 117.4 +/- 25.9
  Background counts = 302.0
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.005

[Wed Aug  8 15:11:06 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.73'
[Wed Aug  8 15:19:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug  8 15:19:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.79"
[Wed Aug  8 15:19:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.013
[Wed Aug  8 15:19:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 0, mean size = 10.79"
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:14 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.csv
[Wed Aug  8 21:48:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:00 2012] Warning: source 71 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 76 at 10.561437 pixels away
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.79"
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:43 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.013
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 65 for pass 1, mean size = 10.79"
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.csv
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.csv
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.csv
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.csv
[Thu Aug  9 14:21:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:09 2012] Source 76 is offset by 4.960203 and -8.361274 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.789779 x 3.789779, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:09 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:09 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:09 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:09 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:09 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:09 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9