[Wed Aug  8 15:12:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (323.1, 347.9) = 20 51 33.54 31 2 48.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 118.3 +/- 22.4
  Background counts = 163.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Wed Aug  8 15:12:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.01'
[Thu Aug  9 01:40:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 01:40:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.43"
[Thu Aug  9 01:40:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.051
[Thu Aug  9 01:40:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 37 for pass 0, mean size = 8.43"
[Thu Aug  9 05:25:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 05:25:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 05:25:36 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 05:25:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 05:25:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 05:25:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:26 2012] Warning, spatial fit 37 centroid is now closest to src. 2
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug  9 05:26:26 2012] Source is confused with source 2
[Thu Aug  9 17:01:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 17:01:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.43"
[Thu Aug  9 17:01:34 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.051
[Thu Aug  9 17:01:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 8.43"
[Thu Aug  9 20:51:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 20:51:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Thu Aug  9 20:51:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 20:51:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Thu Aug  9 20:51:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 20:51:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 20:51:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 20:51:46 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:30 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2293.720000, observed total counts = 2256.000000
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:30 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 0.883906 pixels
[Thu Aug  9 20:52:30 2012] 2165.615600 total counts/ 2096.520000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.509040
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 18 = 0.883906 pixels
  Position = (322.3, 347.5) = 20 51 33.80 31 2 45.0
  Extent = 6.5 (2.8-10.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 69.1 +/- 46.5
  Background counts = 2096.5
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability